Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of sensitivity analysis for all-cause mortality between MINOCA vs MI-CAD

From: Long term all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction with non-obstructed vs obstructed coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of adjusted data

Excluded study

Resultant effect size (Hazard ratios)

Planer 2014 [24]

0.89 (95% CI 0.65, 1.13 I2 = 94% p = 0.28)

Andersson 2018 [22]

0.88 (95% CI 0.66, 1.18 I2 = 94% p = 0.39)

Bainey 2018 [23]

0.91 (95% CI 0.67, 1.23 I2 = 94% p = 0.52)

Barr 2018 [25]

0.94 (95% CI 0.70, 1.25 I2 = 94% p = 0.66)

Choo 2019 [29]

0.89 (95% CI 0.60, 1.20 I2 = 94% p = 0.44)

Dreyer 2020 [19]

0.96 (95% CI 0.80, 1.77 I2 = 62% p = 0.71)

Gasior 2020 [20]

0.86 (95% CI 0.67, 1.11 I2 = 82% p = 0.26)

Lopez-Pais 2020 [21]

0.90 (95% CI 0.68, 1.20 I2 = 94% p = 0.48)

Schmitz 2020 [18]

0.93 (95% CI 0.70, 1.20 I2 = 94% p = 0.61)

Vranken 2020 [13]

0.88 (95% CI 0.65, 1.18 I2 = 94% p = 0.39)

Lawless 2023 [17]

0.94 (95% CI 0.70, 1.28 I2 = 94% p = 0.71)

  1. CI Confidence intervals
Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us