Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies based in Primary Care

From: Clinical assessment of patients with chest pain; a systematic review of predictive tools

Author

Country

Patients for score derivation (n)

Outcome

Patients with outcome n (%)

Maximum time between assessment and outcome measure

Variables

Performance

Soxa 1990 [35]

USA

1074

MI

Angina

Coronary insufficiency

424 (39.5)

1 year

Age

Gender

Exertional pain

Patient stops activities when pain occurs

PMH of MI

Smoking

Pain relived by NTG

For score > 4

S:0.99

Sp:0.18

PPV:0.45

NPV:0.98

Gencer 2010 [36]

Switzerland Germany

661

CAD

85 (12.9)

1 year

Age

Gender

CV Risk Known

Pain location

Pain duration Exertional pain

Pain on palpation

PMH of CVD

AUC: 0.95 (0.92-0.97)

For scores < 5

(Lowest 5 % for patients with CAD):S:0.98

Sp:0.71

NPV:0.99

Bösner 2010 [30]

Germany Switzerland

1199

CAD

180 (15.0)

6 months

Age

Gender

Exertional pain

PMH of CVD

Patient assumes pain of cardiac origin

Pain on palpation

AUC: 0.90 (0.87-0.93)

For a cut-off value of 3 (risk of CAD > 35 %): S:0.86

(0.79-0.92)

Sp:0.75

(0.72-0.78)

PPV:0.35

(0.29-0.41)

NPV:0.97

(0.96-0.98)

  1. MI Myocardial Infarction, PMH Past Medical History, NTG Nitroglycerine, AUC Area Under the Curve, S Sensitivity, Sp Specificity, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value
  2. aThis study included both patients from Cardiology and Primary Care